Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly Gibraltar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cm tony (talk | contribs) at 21:43, 15 June 2007 ([[Fly_Gibraltar]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Fly_Gibraltar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The Project has been cancelled so the page is no longer of interest on wikipedia -Gibnews 19:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you read the front page story in the Gibraltar Chronicle, www.chronicle.gi they say the company name has been cancelled - the Government of Gibraltar are very protective about the use of the word 'Gibraltar' in company names. Although there could be another 'fly Gibraltar ltd' it seems it will not be this one and in the very unlikely event these guys start an airline it would have a different name. So unless there is a category for imaginary airlines, the article has no merit. Incidentally, the Gibraltar Chronicle is the second oldest daily newspaper in the world. --Gibnews 23:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This "airline" does NOT exist. In the hypothetical case that the proposed plans outlined in this article are taken further sometime in the future, the article could be then be created again. Gibmetal 77talk 23:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep; This is history, history of the Rock and the difficulties that are faced with starting up airlines despite given such talk by the Government that we have greater opportunities to now work with the "Cordoba Agreement". Although Fly Gibraltar will not be launching it cannot be forgotten and the hard work that has been put into it. Many civil servants have added to the airline knowing how things could've gone wrong all to have to bow down because there are filthy rich people out there that'd rather buy a condo in Miami than help an airline that will struggle to find its way in the skies for a while!--Cm tony 21:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]