Learning by teaching
In professional education learning by teaching (in German "Lernen durch Lehren", therefore LdL) designates a method which allows pupils and students to prepare and teach lessons or parts of lessons. LdL should not be mixed up with presentations or lectures by students, as students do not only convey a certain content, but choose their own methodological and didactical approach in teaching their calssmates a certain area of the respective subject.
Although Professor Jean-Pol Martin, the promoter of this method, is strictly against the assigning of credits for these lessons, this point remains a focus of discussion.
History
The principle of LdL is not new, it was already part of the so-called Lancaster-Schools. The first book about the topic was published in 1971 in the USA by Gartner and in Germany in 1975 by R. Krüger. A broader recognition of the method started in the early eighties, when Jean-Pol Martin developed the concept systematically for the teaching of French as a foreign language and gave it a theoretical background in numerous publications. At the same time other educational theorists did research in this area (e.g. Renkel, 1997; and a publication in the magazine PÄDAGOGIK, 11/97). The method spread from 1987 on, when Martin founded a network of several thousand teachers that employed LdL in many different subjects, documented its successes and approaches and presented their findings in various teacher training sessions.
From 2001 on LdL has gained more and more supporters as a result of educational reform movements started throughout Germany.
The Method from 2000 on
LdL consists of two components: a general anthropological one and a subject-related one. The anthropological basis of LdL is the pyramide of needs by Abraham Maslow. The task to teach others a certain content should satisfy the need for safety (promotion of self-confidence), for social contact and acceptance as well as give the taught individual a sense of self-realization and transcendence. The latter should be seen with the following in mind: facing the problems of our world today and in the future, it is essential to mobilize as many intellectual ressources as possible - which happens in LdL lessons in a special way. As intense communication is a prerequisite for the shared construction of knowledge, democratic approaches are promoted that way.
Regarding the subject related component (in foreign language teaching), LdL aims to negate the allegedly existing contradiction between the three main components: automatization of speech-related behavior, teaching of cognitively internalized contents and authentic interaction/communication.
The Approach
After intensive preparation by the teacher, students become responsible for their own learning and teaching. The new material is divided into small units and student groups of not more than three people are formed. Each group familiarizes itself with a strictly defined area of new material and gets the assignment to teach the whole group in this area. One important aspect is that LdL should not be confused with a student-as-teacher-centered method. The material should be worked on didactically and methodologically (impulses, social forms, summarizing phases etc.). The teaching students have to make sure their audience has understood their message/topic/grammar points and therefore use different means to do so (e.g. short phases of group or partner exercises, comprehension questions, quizzes etc.)
Most users of LdL (teachers) do not teach all their classes or all the time according to this method. They state the following advantages and disadvantages:
Advantages:
- Students work on the material more intensively and are more active
- Next to subject-related knowledge students gain important key qualifications like
- working in teams
- planning abilities
- reliability
- presentation and moderation skills
- self-confidence
Disadvantages
- The introduction of the method requires a lot of time.
- Students and teachers have to work more than usual.
- the danger of monotony if the teacher does not give didactic impulses.
LdL in its different applications
The method LdL is applied in all types of schools and in all subjects. Most curricula recommend it as an open and pupil-centered option. As a method for further professional training it is for example used with the German "Bundesgrenzschutz" (the Federal Border Guard) or in the professional education of librarians. Furthermore there are experiences with special groups of students (highly gifted ones) and in different cultures. LdL has been researched on a scientific level by a group of researchers concerned with the workings of the brain since 2001.
The method in different educational institutions
In Germany LdL is used in different institutions with different target groups:
- University: Students get the opportunity to train complex thinking for a common generation of knowledge. Research and teaching can be combined harmonically and thus constitute the ideal of university teaching. The initial limitation of the mostly extremely detailed and exhaustive material to a certain core knowledge has proved to be a successful way which is also required by today's working conditions. Later on students are doing research on different subtopics and according to their team's interests. As a rule LdL can be used in each course and with every student group (a group of 15 to 35 participants has proven best). An empirical report with theoretical background, practical advice and bibliographical reference (in German) can be found at LdL: Vorbereitung auf die Wissensgesellschaft an der Uni
- Grammar Schools: LdL was developed at grammar schools, therefore we have got most experiences in this type of school (the German Gymnasium is a secondary school, comprises classes 5-12 or 13 and leads to an exam which enables students to go on to university). This demand is due to the fact that the education and training of teachers working there is not really focussed on teaching skills and methods but on the theoretical knowledge of their respective subject matter. So they have a high need for didactical concepts. Furthermore, LdL is seen as a more cognitive approach in contrast to others like, for example, learning circles or freely chosen work.
- German Realschule: (a secondary school from class 5-10 which leads to an exam that enables students to go on to professional training on a higher level). Education at this kind of school aims not only at theoretical and scientific knowledge, but wants to prepare students in a practical way for the working world. Using LdL they acquire necessary key qualifications like independence, perseverance, flexibility, care, diligence and the skill to present themselves and their material. An advantage for teachers lies in the fact that the use of LdL does not only create diversity and creativity in the classroom, but can specifically promote these characteristics.
- German Hauptschule (a secondary school from class 5-10 which leads to a compulsory exam that enables students to go on doing an apprenticeship). The practical orientation of these schools offer big opportunities for the use of LdL. The advantages of a student activating approach are obvious as most students here had to face harsh failures in their educational lives and therefore are mostly reluctant to work in their classes. By independent presentations in front of their groups they can regain self confidence, pleasure in learning and get immediate feedback. The method is suitable for the complete "Hauptschul"-curriculum, as most of the students' learning approach is a practical one.
LdL from the perspective of several sciences
Brain research: Learning is an organic process of the brain: The coordinated interaction of molecular, cellular and systemic neuronal processes in coorperating subsystems of motoric, sensoric and association. Limited to a special time, individual dispositions for selective capabilities unfold, which involve motoric, forehead-brain relevant thinking in categories of space and time, the lateralified aquisition of language and art skills and limbically induced behavior which is dependent on motivation and emotions. It is shown that 1) learning happens in small and big systems, which selectively stabilize by a connection of structure and function; 2) Learning follows the rules of activity-dependent reorganization and is always exclusively carried by individual motivational and emotional dynamic and neither IQ nor EQ alone, but both together are the requirement for successful learning; 3) sensomotoric and associative circles are involved completely and in a self-amplifying way into the learning process by the individual, which necessarily means „learning by teaching“. (The text was taken from the homepage of Prof. Dr. Gertrud Teuchert-Noodt (2003) (http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/biologie/Neuroanatomie/), from this site: Learning by doing: Physiological foundations of learning (http://mkat.iwf.de/index.asp?Signatur=C%2012425))
To be continued...
The further development
The central dimension, which should be moved forward by the usage of LdL, is the capability to communicate, to geberate knowledge together: cf. communication (lessons). Here, the group is considered a neuronal web which in analogy to the brain produces knowledge as emergence (also cf.: collective intelligence). Thus also the ressource orientation deals with this topic.
A change in paradigm - the society of knowledge
There is a remarkable parallelism between the act of the construction of knowledge during LdL -lessons and the way an internet-encyclopedia works. The fact, that during those lessons pupils who are not considered experts present their knowledge, stimulates the examining attention of their schoolmates. This way all participants in the classroom feeel obliged to work on the completion of the still limited knowledge. This is quite similar to an internet-encyclopedia: The users are only willing to work on texts critically, because they don’t expect the authors to know more than themselves. Only the scientific equalization of all users makes it possible to put existing knowledge – limited as it may be - into the encyclopedia. This new form of constructing knowledge introduces the change from a society of experts, who keep and expand their knowledge to pass it on to a chosen few dependent students, to a society of knowledge, where everyone can equally get involved in the collective construction of knowledge.
New skills are expected of teachers
1. Because the class is structured like a neuronal web (siting in a halfcircle or circle is a precondition) and the communication between pupils gets more and more intensive, the teacher has to get used to recognize the main facts of each contribution and to put them in relation to others. He becomes the organizer of collective reflection and has to steer the flow of thoughts carefully to the course‘s objective without intervening too much. Thus he has to focus on contents, but he has to intervene in the first place on the level of process, so that the communication between pupils (metaphorically: neurons) works fast and directly.
2. As the organizer of collective reflection the teacher has to be sure that it leads to a goal, which is the absorbation of new material by the whole class. Hence at he beginning of the „lesson“ there might be an indefiniteness of contents (no linearity) and in the classroom clarity (linearity a posterion) should be created step by step by working together. A good preparation for the profession of a teacher would therefore be an activity like serving as host of a discussion board, which is about constructing knowledge step by step out of chaotically incoming information. The final point in a transformation of the class to a neuronal web should be a complex structure, which would be more capable of self-organization. According to this concept, successful communication will be the main attribute of problem solvers in the future – many researchers consider this the requirement to a 6th Kondratjew -, Jean-Pol Martin continues developing his concept.