Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPython
Page originally put up for speedy deletion, {{hangon}} was added, and I'd keep the article, but I feel some debate is needed. Evilclown93 15:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't see a speedy tag in the article's history, and there's no reason for deletion stated in the nomination. So where are we going with this?
- There was a hangon and some explanation on the talk page... Evilclown93 18:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
--Butseriouslyfolks 15:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - after going through every single revision of this article, it's never had a speedy at any point - User:Ianozsvald added a {{hangon}} with nothing to hang on for. I'd guess it was posted in error/misunderstanding after receiving this copyvio warning. As it stands I can't see any reason to delete providing the current content isn't a copyvio — iridescenti (talk to me!) 15:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - there was initially a copyvio in copying a few words from the project's own website description. But that's been corrected, and we can easily expand the description with our own words detailing what IPython does. LotLE×talk 16:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above, was never tagged for speedy deletion. -- Phoenix2 (talk, review) 18:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)