Jump to content

Talk:Trusted Execution Technology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robertmh (talk | contribs) at 09:15, 21 May 2007 (POV). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Cleanup

The atricle's comma placement and syntax seems a bit off to me. I'd place a cleanup template, but haven't yet figured out how. Also, the vocabulary seems a bit advertish to me.

Orange & Viridian 09:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i'm not a native english speaker . if you wish to correct my mystakes ,you're welcome. Dbiagioli 13:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)DBiagioli[reply]

la grande main use

Where did you found the info that the TPM is designed to withstand physical attack ? and the packaging is designe to self-destruct ? could you provide a link please?Dbiagioli 07:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV

This phrase is extremely POV: "aimed at giving users, especially in the business segment, a way to defend themselves against software-based attacks aimed at stealing sensitive information".

This is the POV of DRM proponents. OTOH, my POV is that it is aimed at taking freedom away from users, rendering them incapable of defending themselves. Please make this phrase more neutral. For example, it could start with "Intel claims that it is aimed at....", and then followed by "OTOH, opponents of DRM think that...".

See: POV, Digital_restriction_management#Controversy.

Robertmh 09:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]