Jump to content

Rudisill v. McDonough

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Internetronic (talk | contribs) at 15:42, 15 November 2025 (Added docket number.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Rudisill v. McDonough
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 16, 2024
Full case nameRudisill v. McDonough
Docket no.22-888
Citations601 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
Soldiers who accrue educational benefits under both the Montgomery and Post-9/11 GI Bills may use either one and may use them in any order.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinions
MajorityJackson, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett
ConcurrenceKavanaugh, joined by Barrett
DissentThomas, joined by Alito
Laws applied
G.I. Bill

Rudisill v. McDonough, 601 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that soldiers who accrue educational benefits under both the Montgomery and Post-9/11 GI Bills may use either one and may use them in any order.[1][2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Rudisill v. McDonough, 601 U.S. ___ (2024)
  2. ^ "Rudisill v. McDonough". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
[edit]
Stub icon

This article related to a case of the Supreme Court of the United States of the Roberts Court is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rudisill_v._McDonough&oldid=1322317464"