Jump to content

Talk:Thameslink Programme

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 17:01, 13 November 2025 (Archiving 14 discussion(s) to Talk:Thameslink Programme/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Thameslink Programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Thameslink Programme/CommentsTalk:Thameslink Programme/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Thanks for the assessment simply south. Could you please give your reasons for it and perhaps a few tips on how to improve the article? Thanks. Edvid 13:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the very late reply. It is important as it shows the planned improvements to the rail network. It is a generally well known subject and not just a specialist interest. A way to improve is to look at other sources. I feel there are too many references from Network Rail and the Department for Transport so more diversity is needed. Simply south 19:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the additional assessment Slambo - I would also like some comments from you if you have some time thanks. Edvid 21:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 19:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Thameslink Programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both seem OK Dr Sludge (talk) 11:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Proposed rail infrastructure in London

[edit]

Is there a reason why the Thameslink Program article is still in Category:Proposed rail infrastructure in London?

The lede paragraph says: "Work started in 2009 and was completed on 18 September 2020, although trains over the new routes began running in 2018." Are we waiting for something else like longer trains for the Sutton Loop? Big Mac (talk) 23:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]