Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Events

Final Events

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Final Events (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wasn't sure whether to include this as Media and music or Fiction and the arts. Book about UFOs, article sourced to anything except WP:RS coverage of the book itself, review or any article in any mainstream outlet about this book in any way whatsoever. In fact, there's no WP:SIGCOV and this fails not only WP:GNG but WP:BOOKCRIT to boot. Whatever your view on the merits of its content, the book itself does not meet our notability criteria. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Paranormal. Shellwood (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources. There is coverage in The Chaos Conundrum: Essays on UFOs, Ghosts & Other High Strangeness in Our Non-Rational and Atemporal World published by Restar Books, but The Chaos Conundrum likely is an unreliable source. Final Events does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline.

  An alternative to deletion is to redirect to the book's author, Nick Redfern. The title "Final Events" may be too generic of a name. To address that, the article could be moved with no redirect to its full title, Final Events and the Secret Government Group on Demonic UFOs and the Afterlife, and then redirected to Nick Redfern.

  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2025 (UTC)