Talk:Pacific Australia Labour Mobility scheme/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: MCE89 (talk · contribs) 12:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Zzz plant (talk · contribs) 00:59, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MCE89! Interesting topic, thanks for your work on this article. I have some preliminary comments below, will be back soon with more in-depth notes~

Prose

Lede

recommend defining PALM abbreviation in parentheses sometime before first use in lede

History

Operation

Criticism

Sourcing

only possible RS concern is Dev Policy Blog. based on their website they have editorial standards and affiliation w/ Australian National University (+ the individual contributors have credentials) - so I think it's fair to have evaluated this as an RS, but just noting as 'blog' label stands out
Ref layout looks good, appreciate shortened footnotes to refer to multiple page #s of same source without duplicating entire ref.
Not mandatory, but could wiki-link to publication names in refs where appropriate, i.e. to The Guardian. Article would also benefit from archive links for future-proofing.
Earwig gives 12.3% as closest match, and those fragments all look appropriate; no CV concerns.

Scope

Neutrality

Stable

Some back-and-forth in June, but involved editors looked to have had a constructive conversation and no issues since.

Illustration

Single image is appropriate, useful, and properly licensed.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed