Jump to content

Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kirrages (talk | contribs) at 23:32, 15 May 2007 (Reverted 1 edit by 67.181.15.103 (talk) to last revision (129948806) by HG using VP). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


This article is about the kid edition of Euthanasia: Opposing Viints; for the first edition see Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints (1989); for the second edition see Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints (1995); for the fourth edition see Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints (2006).

Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints is a book, in the Opposing Viewpoints series, presenting selections of contrasting points of view on four central questions about euthanasia: whether it is ethical; whether it should be legalized; whether legalizing it would lead to involuntary killing; and whether physicians should assist in suicide. It was edited by James D. Torr.

It was published by Greenhaven Press (San Diego) in 2000 as a 208-page hardcover (ISBN 0-7377-0127-7) and paperback (ISBN 0-7377-0126-9).

Contents

Chapter Viewpoint Author Notes
Why Consider Opposing Viewpoints?
Introduction
Chapter 1: Is Euthanasia Ethical? 1. Voluntary Euthanasia Is Ethical Derek Humphry Reprint of "Why I Believe in Voluntary Euthanasia," 1995 Euthanasia Research & Guidance Organization

(ERGO!) website article.

2. Voluntary Euthanasia Is Unethical Brother Doctor Daniel P. Sulmasy, M.D. Reprint of "Death with Dignity: A Franciscan Doctor's Perspective," St. Anthony Messenger, January 1996.
3. Euthanasia Violates Christian Beliefs Michigan Catholic Conference Excerpt from "Living and Dying According to the Voice of Faith: A Pastoral Letter to the Catholics of the State of Michigan," 1997.
4. Euthanasia Does Not Violate Christian Beliefs John Shelby Spong Reprint of Spong's testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution hearing on "Assisted Suicide in the United States", April 29, 1996.
5. Voluntary Euthanasia Shows Compassion for the Dying Marcia Angell Excerpt from "Helping Desperately Ill People to Die," in Regulating How We Die: The Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues Surrounding Physician-Assisted Suicide (Harvard University Press, 1998, ISBN 0-674-66653-4, ISBN 0-674-66654-2) edited by Linda L. Emanuel.
6. Arguments for Euthanasia Are Unconvincing International Anti-Euthanasia Task Force Reprint of "Euthanasia: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions."
Chapter 2: Should Voluntary Euthanasia Be Legalized? 1. Voluntary Euthanasia Should Be Legalized Faye J. Girsh Reprint of "The Case for Physician Aid in Dying," Journal of the Hippocratic Society, Fall 1997.
2. Voluntary Euthanasia Should Not be Legalized Yale Kamisar Excerpt from "The Reasons So Many People Support Physician-Assisted Suicide—And Why Those Reasons Are Not Convincing," Issues in Law & Medicine, Volume 12, Number 2, Fall 1996.
3. Legalized Euthanasia in the Netherlands Has Not Harmed Dutch Society Ellen Goodman Reprint of "Dutch Deal with Death Their Own Way," Boston Globe, 17 April 1997.
4. Legalized Euthanasia in the Netherlands Has Harmed Dutch Society Terry Golway Reprint of "Life in the 90's," America, 10 May 1997.
5