Talk:Signalling Connection Control Part
Appearance
Unsigned comments from 217.36.0.13
Article contains technical inaccuracies ie: SCCP is defined by the following recommendations :
ITU Q.711 - Q.714, 1992 or ANSI T1.112, 1992 or JT-Q.711 - JT-Q.714, 1992
- ANSI T1.112 an JT-Q.711 are modifications to the ITU's specification, which provides the base spec, as stated in the ‘Published specification’ section. JT-Q.711 - JT.Q714 should be added to the list, though. Nevalicori 11:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Also the "protocol suite" is inaccurate. ISUP is NOT dependant on the use of SCCP as implied.
- It's the stock Wikipedia protocol suite boxout; it's not intended to imply that ISUP requires SCCP, just that ISUP is an example of an Application-layer protocol and SCCP is an example of a Transport-layer protocol, within the context of the SS7 stack. Nevalicori 11:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Protocol Class 4
Anyone know where Protocol Class 4 comes from? There's no mention in latest & greatest ITU-T recommendation (Q.714). Is it an ANSI variant? If so, should be specified as such. Thanks. Carre 15:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)