Talk:HTTP File Server

This article was nominated for deletion on May 5, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

I made the article because this software was already cited in several places in wikipedia. I thought it was a good idea to have those link point to an article instead of my website. Can't say if i will find the time to improve the article these days, but eventually, you know better than me what should be deleted and what should not. --Rejetto 02:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy i found the time :) --Rejetto 21:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HFS

HFS is a great program and I use it so don't delete it Owainbut 11:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! HFS is such a powerful tool, please do not delete this awesome utility from the wikipedia. We are working hard to provide more content for the wikipedia but just give us time, it is hard to find time to do it! That_Stevens_Guy, HFS Forum Operator 3:44, 6 May 2007 (AEST)

Comment

The AfD on this was no consensus, and it looks like that may have been the correct result, as it looks like a decent bit of sourcing is available. However, I've cut a lot of stuff down that appeared to be pretty promotional. We don't need more than one fair-use image in the article, there certainly is no need for more than a single link to the "official site", and web forums are never a reliable source. We also don't need a "list of features", unless independent sources have reported on some feature as really setting this thing apart. I'd strongly encourage everyone here to read the guidelines on editing an article where you may have a conflict of interest, as well as the policy on neutrality. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Printed references

Since i recently moved, and my laptop crashed, it may take 3-4 weeks before i'm able to add the printed references to the article. (--rejetto) --151.75.231.160 13:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]