Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griddlers Solver with Animator

Griddlers Solver with Animator

No notability is even attempted to be established. Page created as spam for a product frequently removed from nonograms article as spammer and continuously put back by owner of the website in question. Person who created this article also placed it back in the article against consensus and has no edit history other than doing so, clear sockpuppet of previous spammer, User:Jsimlo (not user name's similarity to name of website URL, and he has admitted it's his software he is promoting. DreamGuy 23:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have created the article, because I feel it is notable to the problem of solving Nonogram puzzles with computer. I am gathering and preparing data for my bachelor work. I am not an expert, but yet I have not found this kind of alogrithm anywhere else yet. Yes there is other software that tries to solve this puzzle, but they work a bit differently with different results. Also some are notable for their gains as well and I would want to write about one of them as well, after this is resolved.

I believe that the User:DreamGuy is twisting the policies here, pushing his POV and pushing his personal feelings because:

He seems to have personal issues with User:Jsimlo (the author of the Griddlers Solver with Animator) all over the Nonograms history. My guess is that this is just another step in a longer crusade.
He fails to recognize the importance of attempts to solve nonograms by a computer algorithm. Example: Talk:Nonogram#Links, AGAIN.
He removes external links in good faith of removing spam, however, in this case he is trying to delete, what might not be a spam. I have been given an approval from User:Majorly, who apparently thinks this software might be worth of keeping.

Therefore, I believe that User:DreamGuy is pushing his own POV, which does not include any kind of algorithm for solving the Nonogram puzzles, even those that were mentioned by other people as well. And I believe he is pushing his own personal feeling towards User:Jsimlo, accusing me of being a sock puppet of him.

I claim to be no sockpuppet of User:Jsimlo, though my history is small and it started with writting about Jsimlo's software. Give it back 12:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]