Talk:Floodgates principle
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The Floodgate effect article was blanked on 2025-07-25 and that title now redirects to Floodgates principle. The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history; for the discussion at that location, see the redirect's talk page. |
Victorian Railway Commissioners v Coultas
[edit]Where in the Privy Council judgment - or any other judgment - does it say that Mary Coultas suffered any physical injury? The Privy Council judgment doesn't describe any physical injury, and doesn't even mention she was pregnant, which I am sure it would, if she lost her child. I think the original writer may have confused this case with another, in which case some deletion may be warranted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.80.198.84 (talk) 13:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)