Jump to content

Talk:Processor (computing)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2a02:a03f:aada:2701:75af:c2fa:c113:e5e6 (talk) at 11:29, 19 July 2025 (That's not an encyclopedia anymore, but a dictionary.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Braedensb. Peer reviewers: Ronaldwsh, Sticky MD, Iamfromhouston.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an encyclopedia anymore, but a dictionary.

There's a trend to remove any possibly usefull info from wikipedia for a while, exept the definition, just to let skeleton pages (on my experience, usually in the name of a side wiki-tuition where nobody is expecting to find the info, and often never actually created*). An encyclopedia as the word refer to (on the model of the first encyclopedia created by Didero during the reign of Louis the fourtien), means any human knowledge about a topic, not just what you could find in a thick dictionary. To my perspective, as wikipedia was first used for human development around the world, it has been for a while specificly mowed down to push the agenda of cultures where concurrency is about decreasing the productivity of others rather than increasing it's own. So to cut down such a deep topic to just a page, completely destroy the purpose of wikipedia from inside.

  • I often noticed this on technical articles like about iron welding, continually destroyed then remade by someone taking the energy, but computing was spared...

2A02:A03F:AADA:2701:75AF:C2FA:C113:E5E6 (talk) 11:21, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]