Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Composition (objects)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Composition (objects) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page is a mess, I'm not seeing a reason why it has notability outside of Mereology JMWt (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Old-AgedKid (talk) 07:23, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy doesn't appear to have an article dedicated to composite objects, or the composition of objects, as studied in Mereology. They do have one on mereology overall. Right now I'm thinking that that's a better way to organize the subject. Perhaps we should redirect this to Mereology? Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the redirect suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 13:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)