Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufacturing Execution System
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 22:27, 29 June 2025 (Fix Linter errors.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 22:27, 29 June 2025 by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) (Fix Linter errors.)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 20:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Manufacturing Execution System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article has been tagged as non-notable since April 2007. A recent PROD was removed, but the notability tag still applies. Procedural nomination to resolve. —BradV 15:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Plenty of book sources available: book, chapter in this book. Jfire (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, strongly. Article is about a management fad three letter acronym for which no notability is shown in text, and articles like this do not get the benefit of a doubt. When deliberately bad prose and empty, evasive buzzwords are used in the article —
complex solution integrated throughout an enterprise monitoring and controlling all resources used in the manufacturing process from cradle to grave and touching other enterprise systems
— the word solution is used inappropriately, one can't escape the suspicion that this is stealth spam designed to promote a business or consultancy. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is little in the article to recommend anything else. --Stormbay (talk) 02:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Gavin Collins (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I concur with Smerdis of Tlön, this appears to be an advertorial for some sort of consultancy "solution", but there are no reliable sources independent of the subject to demonstrate notability. --Gavin Collins (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.