Jump to content

Talk:This Man... This Monster!/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:This Man... This Monster!
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Simongraham (talk | contribs) at 14:31, 31 May 2025 (Criteria). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 14:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a relatively new topic for me and I feel this article is worth looking at as an introduction for me. I will complete a review as part the May 2025 Backlog Drive. simongraham (talk) 14:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • First, some general comments
  • Overall, this is a well-written article.
  • It is of reasonable length, with 1,407 words of readable prose.
  • The lead is appropriately long at 292 words.
  • Authorship is 84.3% from the nominator with contributions from 20 other editors.
  • Marcus Brute turned the article from a redirect in 2010, although without references. Less than 10% of this content remains.
  • It is currently assessed as a B class article.
  • "The Galactus Trilogy" is a duplicate link although I feel in a way that is consistent with the MOS.
  • Although not a GA criteria, suggest adding ALT text to the images for accessibility.
  • Similarly suggest moving Lican & Rizzo 2002, Morrow 2007, and Weiner 2008 to the same format as the remaining books for consistency.

Criteria

The six good article criteria:

  1. It is reasonable well written.
    the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
    • The writing is generally clear and appropriate.
    • I think "a" is redundant in ""This Man... This Monster!" considers what makes someone as a monster" and that "a" or "the" is missing from "with football star".
    • Consider "Ben's desire to restore his human form, redemption of villains through sacrifice, and the nature of exploration and introspection."
    • I can see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.
    it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
    • It seems to comply with the Manuals of Style.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    • A reference section is included, with sources listed.
    all inline citations are from reliable sources;
    • Sources are principally books from reputable publishers, one article from Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics and another from The Jack Kirby Collector.
    • Please confirm that the websites AIPT and Multiversity Comics are reliable.
    it contains no original research;
    • All relevant statements have inline citations.
    • Spot checks confirm 2a, 13, 14 are used appropriately. 19 seems superfluous.
    • AGF Wolk 2021 as I do not have access to it.
    it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
    • Earwig gives a 9.9% chance of copyright violation. The highest overlap is titles in Wolk, which is not a concern.
    • "a loose continuation" is exactly how Wilding describes Fantastic Four: Full Circle, although I am not sure if this is also contra-NPOV as is presenting opinion as fact.
  3. It is broad in its coverage
    it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:This_Man..._This_Monster!/GA1&oldid=1293232414"