Talk:This Man... This Monster!/GA1
GA review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 14:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
This is a relatively new topic for me and I feel this article is worth looking at as an introduction for me. I will complete a review as part the May 2025 Backlog Drive. simongraham (talk) 14:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- First, some general comments
- Overall, this is a well-written article.
- It is of reasonable length, with 1,407 words of readable prose.
- The lead is appropriately long at 292 words.
- Authorship is 84.3% from the nominator with contributions from 20 other editors.
- Marcus Brute turned the article from a redirect in 2010, although without references. Less than 10% of this content remains.
- It is currently assessed as a B class article.
- "The Galactus Trilogy" is a duplicate link although I feel in a way that is consistent with the MOS.
- Although not a GA criteria, suggest adding ALT text to the images for accessibility.
- Similarly suggest moving Lican & Rizzo 2002, Morrow 2007, and Weiner 2008 to the same format as the remaining books for consistency.
Criteria
The six good article criteria:
- It is reasonable well written.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- The writing is generally clear and appropriate.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;