Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singh Anisha

Singh Anisha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Refs are routine interviews, "Meet Anisha" type churnalism articles, profiles and other business news. scope_creep^Talk 16:52, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:19, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP: TNT - yet another page about a marginally notable business person buried under a collapsed wall of trivia, unreliable sources, atrocious writing, and non-sequiturs. Sorry, not sorry. I have so many questions. When people write such pages, do they even bother to read what they wrote, and compare them to other Wikipedia articles? Was this written by AI? Was this written by someone who works under her? I would like to stubify this page into something coherent, if given the green light. I'm trying to see if they have even two sources towards significant coverage. Ping me. Bearian (talk) 01:23, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bearian, Thank you for your feedback on this AFD. I have emphasized four important references; kindly review them. I would appreciate it if you will reevaluate your perspective. IntellectualPoint (talk) 04:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't find this personality as the notable business person as per the Wikipedia guidelines of notability.Almandavi (talk) 06:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Almandavi, Thank You for your participation in this afd. I am curious whether you conducted a WP:BEFORE prior to contributing your opinions here. IntellectualPoint (talk) 04:52, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Bearian. This might even be eligible for WP:G4 on account of being very similar to a previously deleted version under the correct title of Anisha Singh (repeatedly recreated). Yuvaank (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are a lot of significant coverage which is independent of the subject and from reliable sources such as [1] - This article is written by Jamie McCrary from American University, which is in-depth, independent and from reliable source. [2] - This article is from The Economic Times written independently by Usha Rani Das, who is a staff business reporter at The Economic Times. [3] - This is another example of significant coverage written by Rinku Paul & Puja Singhal from Scroll.in. [4] - This article is written by Femina (India) staff, Femina is an Indian business magazine focused on Woman empowerment. And i can see there are many more articles which meets the criteria WP:SIGCOV, WP:THREE and WP:BASIC. IntellectualPoint (talk) 04:42, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]