Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C3 linearization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

C3 linearization

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the article gives the impression of failing WP:NOTHOW. Sources are of mixed quality; a Wordpress article is used. LR.127 (talk) 20:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. LR.127 (talk) 20:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - Talk page has multiple discussions about errors in the article. There isn't any contention, just confusion (e.g. heads or tails, K3 or K2) and errors identified. I checked the article history, only one is a correction. This would suggest DRAFTIFYING except for the fact that it doesn't seem suitable for inclusion to begin with, due to WP:NOTHOW. (It is WP:NOTHOW that doesn't do a good job of providing the HOW.)--FeralOink (talk) 12:26, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.