Jump to content

Draft:Traffic Signal Control

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gpnupaper (talk | contribs) at 08:28, 4 April 2025 (-- Draft creation using the WP:Article wizard --). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Traffic signal control refers to the use of traffic lights and optimization algorithms to manage vehicle and pedestrian flow at intersections, aiming to reduce congestion, improve safety, and enhance fuel efficiency. Modern approaches leverage computational methods such as reinforcement learning (RL), genetic programming (GP), and multi-agent systems, with recent advancements focusing on explainability and urban network scalability[1][2].

Overview

Traditional traffic signal control systems (e.g., fixed-time and max-pressure) rely on predefined timing plans or manually designed rules. In contrast, adaptive traffic signal control (ATSC) dynamically adjusts signal phases based on real-time traffic data. Key methodologies include:

Modern Techniques

1. Reinforcement Learning (RL)

RL-based methods, such as multi-agent Q-learning and graph convolutional neural networks (GCNN), have shown promise in optimizing signal timing for multi-intersection networks[7][8]:

  • Advantages: Adaptability to dynamic traffic conditions.
  • Limitations: Black-box decision-making, high computational cost[7].

2. Genetic Programming (GP) for Explainable Control

Liu et al. (2024) proposed a genetic programming-based framework for urban traffic signal control, generating human-interpretable rules while while enhancing traffic efficiency and alleviating congestion[9]. Key contributions include:

  • Explainability: Unlike RL, GP produces transparent control logic.
  • Scalability: Tested on Synthetic Grid and Real-World Berlin networks and perform low and high traffic simulation on the commonly used SUMO.
  • Performance: Achieved a 30% reduction in average travel time compared to fixed-time, max-pressure, and meta-heuristic baselines (e.g., particle swarm optimization) control in high traffic levels.

3. Hybrid Approaches

  • PSO + Cell Transmission Model: Combines macroscopic traffic flow modeling with swarm intelligence for signal timing optimization in dynamic networks[10].
  • GCNN + RL: Automates feature extraction for large-scale networks[7].

Evaluation and Benchmarks

Recent studies use simulators like SUMO and CityFlow for standardized testing. Key metrics include:

  • 'Average travel time: e.g., Liu et al. In Berlin's real-world network, GP's average time was 257.5 seconds (vs. 505.6 seconds for fixed-time)[9].
  • Lane occupancy: e.g., 30% lower cumulative occupancy vs. max-pressure methods in peak traffic (5515.2 vs. 9099.1 in Berlin)[9].

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Real-world deployment: Most methods remain simulation-tested[11].
  • Mixed traffic environments: Human-driven and autonomous vehicle coexistence[12].
  • Standardization: Libraries like LibSignal aim to unify evaluation[13].

See Also

References

  1. ^ Yuan, Hao; Yu, Haiyang; Gui, Shurui; Ji, Shuiwang (2023-05). "Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Survey". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 45 (5): 5782–5799. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3204236. ISSN 1939-3539. Retrieved 2025-03-11. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ Xie, Guorui; Li, Qing; Jiang, Yong (2021-09-04). "Self-attentive deep learning method for online traffic classification and its interpretability". Computer Networks. 196: 108267. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108267. ISSN 1389-1286. Retrieved 2025-03-11.
  3. ^ Boukerche, Azzedine; Zhong, Dunhao; Sun, Peng (2022-02). "A Novel Reinforcement Learning-Based Cooperative Traffic Signal System Through Max-Pressure Control". IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 71 (2): 1187–1198. doi:10.1109/TVT.2021.3069921. ISSN 1939-9359. Retrieved 2025-03-11. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. ^ Hao, Shenxue; Yang, Licai; Shi, Yunfeng; Guo, Yajuan (2020-09-01). "Backpressure based traffic signal control considering capacity of downstream links". Transport. 35 (4): 347–356. doi:10.3846/transport.2020.13288. ISSN 1648-3480. Retrieved 2025-03-11.
  5. ^ Ma, Dongfang; Xiao, Jiawang; Song, Xiang; Ma, Xiaolong; Jin, Sheng (2021-09). "A Back-Pressure-Based Model With Fixed Phase Sequences for Traffic Signal Optimization Under Oversaturated Networks". IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 22 (9): 5577–5588. doi:10.1109/TITS.2020.2987917. ISSN 1558-0016. Retrieved 2025-03-11. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ Mao, Tuo; Mihăită, Adriana-Simona; Chen, Fang; Vu, Hai L. (2022-07). "Boosted Genetic Algorithm Using Machine Learning for Traffic Control Optimization". IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 23 (7): 7112–7141. doi:10.1109/TITS.2021.3066958. ISSN 1558-0016. Retrieved 2025-04-04. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. ^ a b c d Huang, Hao; Hu, Zhiqun; Lu, Zhaoming; Wen, Xiangming (2023-01). "Network-Scale Traffic Signal Control via Multiagent Reinforcement Learning With Deep Spatiotemporal Attentive Network". IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 53 (1): 262–274. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2021.3087228. ISSN 2168-2275. Retrieved 2025-03-11. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ a b Ma, Dongfang; Zhou, Bin; Song, Xiang; Dai, Hanwen (2022-08). "A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to Traffic Signal Control With Temporal Traffic Pattern Mining". IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 23 (8): 11789–11800. doi:10.1109/TITS.2021.3107258. ISSN 1558-0016. Retrieved 2025-03-11. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. ^ a b c Liu, Wei-Li; Zhong, Jinghui; Liang, Peng; Guo, Jianhua; Zhao, Huimin; Zhang, Jun (2024-07-01). "Towards explainable traffic signal control for urban networks through genetic programming". Swarm and Evolutionary Computation. 88: 101588. doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2024.101588. ISSN 2210-6502. Retrieved 2025-04-04.
  10. ^ Tang, Li; He, Qing; Wang, Dingsu; Qiao, Chunming (2022-01). "Multi-Modal Traffic Signal Control in Shared Space Street". IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 23 (1): 392–403. doi:10.1109/TITS.2020.3011677. ISSN 1558-0016. Retrieved 2025-04-04. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  11. ^ Lu, Yunxue; Li, Changze; Wang, Hao (2024-12). "Learning in practice: reinforcement learning-based traffic signal control augmented with actuated control". Transportation Planning and Technology: 1–29. doi:10.1080/03081060.2024.2434857. ISSN 1029-0354 0308-1060, 1029-0354. Retrieved 2025-04-04. {{cite journal}}: Check |issn= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  12. ^ Majstorović, Željko; Tišljarić, Leo; Ivanjko, Edouard; Carić, Tonči (2023-04-01). "Urban Traffic Signal Control under Mixed Traffic Flows: Literature Review". Applied Sciences. 13 (7): 4484. doi:10.3390/app13074484. ISSN 2076-3417. Retrieved 2025-04-04.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  13. ^ Mei, Hao; Lei, Xiaoliang; Da, Longchao; Shi, Bin; Wei, Hua (2024-08-01). "Libsignal: an open library for traffic signal control". Machine Learning. 113 (8): 5235–5271. doi:10.1007/s10994-023-06412-y. ISSN 1573-0565. Retrieved 2025-04-04.