Jump to content

Talk:Spanning Tree Protocol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tule-hog (talk | contribs) at 16:53, 2 April 2025 (Merge: sign). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Algorhymes rock!

Please add more specifications like this. Very nice. =) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.98.173.72 (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

STP was designed to monitor and control the Layer2 Network, it has different variations like RSTP,MSTP and PVST+. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.227.180.247 (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
yes for my career prospectus, please add RSTP, MSTP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.91.73.214 (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
yet another vote - merge the 3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.54.196.86 (talk) 03:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Since all of the articles discuss a form of the STP algorithm, they should be merged under one twiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ftmkx (talkcontribs) 22:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol was merged. We still have a separate Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol article. ~Kvng (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PortFast

There is no mention of Cisco's PortFast STP optimization in this article or elsewhere on Wikipedia. My understanding is that when enabled, PortFast puts a port into forwarding mode immediately after link is established. This gives end stations immediate connectivity at the expense of the possibility of a brief storm if the connection results in a loop. I believe the PortFast option was incorporated into the RSTP enhancement but I need someone to verify this before editing the article. Meanwhile, I've removed recent edit claiming that Blocking is the initial state for STP. While the statement is true for the original 802.1D, it needs some qualification given the above. --Kvng (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still no discussion of portfast here or elsewhere on Wikipedia. ~Kvng (talk) 02:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge due to lack of discussion. OrdinaryGiraffe (talk) 23:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spanning Tree Protocol § Bridge protocol data units already appears to be more comprehensive than Bridge protocol data unit so the latter is likely not necessary. Anything not already covered here can be merged and Bridge protocol data unit turned into a redirect. ~Kvng (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.