This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject JavaScript, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to JavaScript, and to the development of user scripts for use on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaScriptWikipedia:WikiProject JavaScriptTemplate:WikiProject JavaScriptJavaScript
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following sources:
Miller, F. P., Vandome, A. F., & McBrewster, J. (2010), JavaScript: JavaScript syntax, client-side JavaScript, JavaScript engine, Ajax (programming), Web interoperability, web accessibility, cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery, ECMAScript, dynamic HTML, Alphascript Publishing{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Miller, F. P., Vandome, A. F., & McBrewster, J. (2009), JSON: Computer programming, human-readable medium, data structure, associative array, Douglas Crockford, Internet media type, serialization, Ajax (programming), XML, JavaScript, Ecma International, Alphascript{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Add Perl to the list of "Influenced By", links to sources can be found in the talk section.
Reasoning:
It's not only very obvious that perl influenced methods in the Array, String and RegEx objects by name and semantic. The original source code of JavaScript is explicitly referencing Perl in the comments on numeral occasions.
Perl might be an unpopular language in 2025 but was very popular at the time of the creation of JS.
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Where you write "links to sources", do you mean the one link you included in the section you created just above? That's one person's blog, unfortunately, which doesn't qualify as a reliable source. Can you supplied at least one? Aside from that, I'm looking at where AWK, Self, and HyperTalk are listed and thinking that if they're truly a source they ought to be mentioned as such in the article's body, but they aren't. Largoplazo (talk) 15:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image from the Chinese blog entry mentioned in the other blog shows a grep in the original code base of JS mentioning Perl
That doesn't remotely qualify as a reliable source, and using it would probably amount to original research, which isn't permitted; at best, it's a primary source. Did you follow the link to the guideline about reliable sources to acquaint yourself with what's meant by that here? Largoplazo (talk) 16:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not really because it's only claimed to be the real thing by a blog that itself isn't a reliable source. The MDN link you provided below is much more relevant. Largoplazo (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]