Talk:The C Programming Language
Disambig needed?
Is a disambig really needed when the first sentence makes it patently clear that this is about the book about the language and links to the language? I see no advantage for the disambig over not having one, and it clutter's the page and is redundant. I didn't revert because I'd prefer to come to an understanding. - Taxman 17:46, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
- I agree with Taxman. - Bevo 18:28, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Well, someone reverted and I'm in no mood to start an edit war. I see your point. - EatMyShortz 03:02, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
How do you know this?
You say: As of 2006, there is no new edition covering C99. How do you know this? Is there an Internet article (because I can't find one)?
Informal wording
The influence of The C Programming Language on programmers, a generation of which "cut their teeth" on C in universities and industry [...]
I'm not a native English speaker, and I don't understand what "cutting their teeth" means. Could somebody please replace this expression with a more formal, understandable form? rbonvall 12:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- It means to learn something at the beginning of one's career, influencing one's future habits. It's a widespread English idiom that can be found in good English dictionaries under "cut", and it's the best phrasing to use in this sentence, so I don't think it should be changed personally. Many Wikipedia articles rely on uncommon English words; take it as an opportunity to get better at the language! Redquark 18:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)