Talk:Cantor's paradox

Need more context

I've given this article a general cleanup, but I think it could use a little more:

The formal statement of Cantor's paradox isn't so great.
Some context explaining why Cantor's paradox is significant would be very useful here.

If we can fix those two things then I think the {{attention}} tag can be taken away. Tim Pierce 06:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a major revision on the page and I think I've addressed your concerns, so I'm excising the {{attention}} tag. Ryan Reich 17:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NBG set theory

"The fact that NBG set theory resolves the paradox is therefore a point in its favor as a suitable replacement."

What is NBG set theory? This should either be a link, or it should be removed. Surely axiomatic set theory is the standard 'replacement' for nieve set theory anyway. InformationSpace 00:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]