User talk:MatthewtheUnicoder

December 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Microsoft Translator, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Stop re-adding the "languages in development" and "beta version" section without a source to support it 121.130.76.132 (talk) 01:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning. Seasider53 (talk) 01:45, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Procedures

Nearly all your edits have been reverted. That means that other editors believe there is a problem. When that happens, it is necessary to discuss the issue and work out how difficulties can be overcome. There are various policies such as WP:V and WP:EW but the important point is that disagreements must be discussed on the talk page of the article concerned. Being reverted demonstrates that there is a significant disagreement. You will be blocked if disruption continues. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 04:11, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Alphabet-of-aymara-language-from-south-america.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Alphabet-of-aymara-language-from-south-america.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.alamy.com/alphabet-of-aymara-language-from-south-america-alphabet-der-aymara-sprache-aus-sdamerika-historisch-historical-digital-improved-reproduction-of-an-original-from-the-19th-century-digitale-reproduktion-einer-originalvorlage-aus-dem-19-jahrhundert-image401579548.html?imageid=3EC8E1E2-0648-491F-B929-B8CD0FA55871&p=1400692&pn=1&searchId=7fe63beb4c3fb4043a87eab0655e6c1c&searchtype=0 and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ForsythiaJo (talk) 21:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aymara script moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aymara script. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:58, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IOS 19 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to IOS 19. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and product has not been released. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Attempting to add salted topics

Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia and trigger the edit filter, as you did at Jeffy, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK I will not reedit the Jeffy page again MatthewtheUnicoder (talk) 00:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unidings moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Unidings. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:07, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roys Bedoys moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Roys Bedoys. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IOS 19 (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Epluribusunumyall was:

WP:TOOSOON, suggest keeping the article in draftspace for the next couple of months so additional references can be found, and then re-submitting for AfC review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IOS 19 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MatthewtheUnicoder! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Windows XP. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, MatthewtheUnicoder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page ChromeOS 2nd Gen did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Peace, G4† (talk, ask questions, dispute a tagging) 02:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ChromeOS 2nd Gen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to ChromeOS 2nd Gen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:37, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roys Bedoys

The article Roys Bedoys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional character with no claim to significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 10:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated additions of unsourced and trivial content about fonts and scripts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:09, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MatthewtheUnicoder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here MatthewtheUnicoder (talk) 20:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC) Hello, so I will not add that in the page every again so may you please unblock me?[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand how to properly source content. Yamla (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

List of Scripts Added in Windows moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Scripts Added in Windows. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:47, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of scripts added in iOS

The article List of scripts added in iOS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTLIST, no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WhoAteMyButter (🌷_talk│🌻^contribs) 03:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Returning to exactly the same disruptive editing that got you blocked last time is a terrible idea. You should stop making these lists of fonts, it is counter to the purpose of Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 03:53, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IOS 19 (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

Please listen to the advice given in the previous decline. Resubmitting a draft with no improvement is disruptive and could lead to it getting nominated for deletion. This draft has no sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IOS 19 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 06:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roys Bedoys

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roys Bedoys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jolielover♥talk 02:22, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ChromeOS 2nd Gen (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ChromeOS 2nd Gen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pukesicle

Hello, MatthewtheUnicoder

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Pukesicle, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|A09}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

A09|(talk) 21:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Freestyle (Graphic Novel)

The article Freestyle (Graphic Novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, not a single source cited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for disruptive editing in article space.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MatthewtheUnicoder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here MatthewtheUnicoder (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC) I won't create disruptive pages again and I will be editing good pages.[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:MatthewtheUnicoder|MatthewtheUnicoder]] ([[User talk:MatthewtheUnicoder#top|talk]]) 00:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC) I won't create disruptive pages again and I will be editing good pages. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:MatthewtheUnicoder|MatthewtheUnicoder]] ([[User talk:MatthewtheUnicoder#top|talk]]) 00:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC) I won't create disruptive pages again and I will be editing good pages. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:MatthewtheUnicoder|MatthewtheUnicoder]] ([[User talk:MatthewtheUnicoder#top|talk]]) 00:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC) I won't create disruptive pages again and I will be editing good pages. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

MatthewtheUnicoder (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]