Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive utilization theory
Not a single secondary source given. Reads more like a manifest than an encyclopedia article. --Pjacobi 20:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Pls also compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social cycle theory (Sarkar) --Pjacobi 20:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep that one. Few hundred google hits ([1]) but more importantly, few dozen Google Print hits ([2]). This can stay as a separate article.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 22:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. The deletion recommendation is not supported by good reasoning. If there is a POV issue it is handled by a specific procedure devoted to that issue. Budfin 10:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep this one. Fully agree with the above statement.