Talk:Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio

Player Project

Player Project has its own wikipedia page, so information about player project belongs there, including external links. An entry in the see also section is more appropriate pcr^talk 03:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is relevant the good and bad thing of an article topic, for a NPOV. I.e. Esperanto, Biodiesel, Ethanol fuel and so on. One can do it in two ways. Include a criticism section or include a link to other robotics suites (the concurrency it is basic for full NPOV - i.e. see cars topics-). --Altermike 06:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you rephrase this in plain english please, I am having great difficulty following your argument. pcr^talk 00:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of articles includes criticism to the different topics and because of this, they are neutral. Non-neutrality would be not include the criticism to the article. (have you seen any article of the mentioned?)--Altermike 17:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

The logo programming language has no direct relevance to Microsoft Robotics Studio. While Microsoft Visual Programming Language, as a dataflow language has some similarities to functional programming languages like logo, and while robotic turtles have been used in robotics education, there is not currently any work that I am aware of that makes this relevant pcr^talk 03:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As in Player Project, one can include this in the criticism section (as in other products, it forgets this traditional and easy to use robotic language ) or as a link. --Altermike 06:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]