Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auscision Models

Auscision Models

A non-notable model train manufacturer Mattinbgn/^talk 22:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for similar reasons:

Delete both for failing WP:CORP. Choo choo! YechielMan 00:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 00:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete. Re:"Choo choo!", YechielMan, perhaps you'd like to supply a list of your hobbies so that we can insult them in a similar way? Grutness...wha? 00:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It was a joke. I'll honor your request by pointing to a satirical essay by H. G. Wells, "Concerning Chess". YechielMan 14:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - OK, fair enough. Humour doesn't always come across that way when it's written only - sorry :) Grutness...wha? 05:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced, but I almost wanted to type "keep" just to counter the silly stuff behind the delete comment Grutness was referring to... —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-25 07:08Z
Very reluctant delete - I've done my best to source this, but I can find only one actual article about the company - every other hit is either on a catalogue entry for a shop stocking them or fan forums discussing their products. Leave this one for the full 5 days though to give any Aus/NZ editors a shot at expanding and sourcing this though - any genuine coverage they've had is going to be in specialist magazines that won't necessarily have found their way online — iridescenti (talk to me!) 16:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Ga rr ie 02:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- not notable at all. TarquiniusWikipedius 07:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- not notable.SlideAndSlip 14:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]