Jump to content

User:Prrl201/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Prrl201 (talk | contribs) at 02:34, 12 December 2024 (Social Class Ladder). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Social Class Ladder

The social class ladder is a conceptual framework that is commonly used in sociology. This represents the social class ranking between individuals and groups. It illustrates how wealth, social status, cultural capital and political influence individuals' social class. Looking at the history of social class ladder, this concept has developed from rigid and ascribed hierarchies such as feudal and caste system to a more affluent and complex system which evolute along with the industrialization and capitalist economies. This concept is shaped by three major influential theorists. One of the major theorists is Karl Marx, he reveals that economic relationships and class conflict have been underlined as crucial in motivating social change. On the other hand, Max Weber provided a multidimensional perspective on economic criteria, power and social status. While Emile Durkheim made valuable contributions to social norms and institutions perpetuate class divisions

In many of the western countries, it is often viewed as a reflection of the opportunity for upward mobility that is contingent upon personal achievement. In contract, more rigid structured systems like South Asian caste system, it highlights structural barriers. Although this class ladder has been criticized as oversampling the social dynamics and completely Ignored the complexity of intersectionality, this ladder has remained an important tool for analyzing inequality and social mobility.

Historical Context

Origins

The concept of social class ladder has its roots in the enduring hierarchical systems that have organized human societies from ancient times to the medieval period. Early social class structures always falsify or maintain by the tradition, law and religion which doesn’t leave any chance for mobility. In many ancient civilizations, such as Mesopotamia and dynastic China, social class ladder was linked to hereditary lineage, professional guilds, or religious castes. Upper class such as priestly orders, warrior aristocracies, or landed nobility own the highest tier of the social power. Similar occasions appeared throughout much of the premodern world including medieval Europe’s feudal system. Under the system of feudal, aristocrats and clergy have the priority to access in land, power and education. However, people like peasants and serfs must take part in agricultural labor as they don’t have any other pathways to rise their social class. While caste system in South Asia established another model of social stratification, which not only limits social status and the career options from birth, but also restrict cross-caste interaction and marriage.

Along with the sociological thought appeared in 19th century, the knowledge based with better systematic and understanding emeged. This attributed to three inlflenced theorists Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim. Karl Marx put class conflict in the first place of historical development while responding to the ravages of the Industrial Revolution. He revealed the society is divided into two classes under capitalism. The two classes are bourgeoisie-who owned power of production; and proletariat-who sold their labor in order to survive. According to Karl Marx, the social order is reshape due to the fundamental tensions produced by the economic relationship. While Karl Marx focus on material conditions, Max Weber introducted a new approach with more dimensions to stratification. He merged economic class with social status and political influence. He recognized that class is not only a single category but an aspect of a wider hierarchy which this hierarchy included social prestige and the ability to take conof the power in political and organizational means.