Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemxpert Database

Chemxpert Database

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent WP:PROMO violation. Article contains no third-party sourcing at all; external links provide some third-party interviews but nothing independent of the subject. On running the usual searches, I have not been able to locate anything that is even minimally suggestive of independent coverage in reliable sources, on which an encyclopedic article could be based. So I'm not sure this even meets WP:V, let alone WP:GNG, let alone WP:NCORP. (NB: there is also a "ChemXpert" software product that does not appear to be related to this company, which comes up in some Google Scholar searches.) Visviva (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Uttar Pradesh and Websites. Visviva (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Pretty obvious promotional/advertising article which is just a product a company puts out. Nothing encyclopedic about it. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 08:55, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All extrenal links are removed from article. Pharmadatabase (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can concur to your points. Unless this website becomes notable or is expected to be notable in the near future, I don't see a reason to keeps it. It is far from meeting even the verifiability guideline. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 09:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]