Talk:Current source density analysis

This page seems exceedingly obscure. Am I missing something? Raidfibre

If I could understand the explanation on this page, then I doubt I would have ended up here. It would be helpful if someone could "dumb it down" a bit for us laymen. Jerryjjr (talk) 08:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this is a horrible article. The problem is it was obviously written by a neurologist or medical student who has never taken an electromagnetics course and is trying to define the concepts using what he learned in electrophysiology courses. His vague analogies, drawings of eyeballs and "visible" and "invisible" boxes show that he never bothered to actually look up the physics. Current sources and sinks are concepts which are precisely defined in electromagnetics, and any 2nd year physics or electrical engineering student could straighten this article out (after he got done laughing at it). When I get time, if nobody else has I will take a crack at it. --Chetvorno^TALK 23:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced article

I suggest changing the categories to neurobiology, replacing the "electromagnetism" at the top with neurobiology, changing the title to Current sources and sinks (neurobiology) then removing the see also onks as not relevant. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]