Talk:Hibernate (framework)

This article does not mention the Hibernate Query Language (HQL).gfngh

I have never heard Hibernate referred to as H8, does someone have a reference for this? -- AndyHedges

Yeah, I removed it. It doesn't pass the Wikipedia:Google test. -Hyad 17:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguity: OS hibernation

It may be worthwhile to somewhere mention the "Hibernate" feature on the Windows (and possibly other) OS, which allows a computer to shut down entirely and then restore the session pristinely upon next startup. I'm guessing there are alot more users of this feature than of the programming toolkit, if for no other reason than the broad reach of Windows. -Joshuapaquin 19:29, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I read this and thought WTF is this, some kind of toolkit program? I thought this article was going to be about the Windows hibernate function. Hbdragon88 22:21, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest moving this to Hibernate (java) and creating a page on the os feature at hibernate (operating systems). as for disambiguating them i think the disambig page should go at either Hibernate or hibernate (disambiguation) depending on if people think the animal thing is a strong enough primary topic (i'm enclined to think the disambiguation page should go at hibernate as the animal behaviour is properly titled hibernation anyway). Plugwash 16:22, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i'm going ahead and making hibernate a disambiguation page moving this page to hibernate (java) and redirecting hibernate (software) to hibernate.

As i was doing the rearranging i noticed an existing page on the OS deature at hibernate (computing) i only noticed it when i did a what links here. Since i'd already made a page at hibernate (operating system) i couldn't put it there so i've used hibernate (OS feature) instead for now.

Language

Large sections of this page read like marketting material for Hibernate. It could do with rewritting. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.32.240.68 (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Compare to Standards Based frameworks?

Like JPOX.

Quote from JPOX site: " You can use a proprietary or non-standards compliant persistence framework like TopLink, or Hibernate and persist your plain old Java objects. You will, however, be tied in to their API and be unable to easily move your system to an alternative implementation.

Alternatively you can use JDO, a standardised persistence interface. With JDO you can take your plain old Java objects and just persist them as they are. It is totally transparent and very little work is required by the developer." (http://www.jpox.org/docs/jdo/jdo_why.html)

So, any argument about this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.214.130.248 (talk) 07:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]