Draft:Framework bias
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,141 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Framework bias occurs when researcher's thinking becomes overly reliant on a particular mental model or framework, limiting the ability to consider alternative perspectives or solutions[1]. This can happen when we use a familiar framework to analyze a new situation without fully considering its unique characteristics[1]. As a result, researchers may miss important details, make inaccurate assumptions, or fail to generate creative solutions [1]. To mitigate framework bias, it's essential to actively seek out diverse perspectives, challenge our own assumptions, and be open to alternative frameworks [1].
[[Category:Science]]
References
- ^ a b c d McKercher, Bob; Moyle, Brent (2025-02-01). "Beware of framework bias". Tourism Management. 106: 104992. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104992. ISSN 0261-5177.