Draft:Framework bias
![]() | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by ValerioRSNeto (talk | contribs) 5 months ago. (Update) |
Framework bias occurs when researcher's thinking becomes overly reliant on a particular mental model or framework, limiting the ability to consider alternative perspectives or solutions[1]. This can happen when we use a familiar framework to analyze a new situation without fully considering its unique characteristics[1]. As a result, researchers may miss important details, make inaccurate assumptions, or fail to generate creative solutions [1]. To mitigate framework bias, it's essential to actively seek out diverse perspectives, challenge our own assumptions, and be open to alternative frameworks [1].
References
- ^ a b c d McKercher, Bob; Moyle, Brent (2025-02-01). "Beware of framework bias". Tourism Management. 106: 104992. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104992. ISSN 0261-5177.