Talk:Query understanding

Since this is a new page, it is not unexpected that is has several issues that need to be resolved:

Additional citations for verification
Evidence of notability
Response to concern that it contains original research
Links from related articles

The above issues seem to be resolved for now. Dtunkelang (talk) 18:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removals of content in October 2024

Several recent edits from @MrOllie removed content from this entry. The removals include the sections on tokenization and spelling correction. As a significant contributor to this page, I hesitate to revert these edits since that could appear to many as a conflict of interest -- especially since one of the removals was a link to my external content. Nonetheless, I am not persuaded that these removals improve the entry. I hope that having more people involved can help establish a consensus about what does and does not belong in this entry. Dtunkelang (talk) 22:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The citations did not relate to the ostensible topic of this article at all. The placement of the text was clearly WP:OR. If you want to propose citations that explain Tokenization and spelling correction in the context of this article I could support adding a sentence or two back, but this is not the place to (re)define generic processes used in any sort of text processing, certainly not based on generic definitions of the terms as cites. Linking to one's blog is also a pretty clear no-go per WP:EL. MrOllie (talk) 22:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a copy of Query Understanding for Search Engines but you can see from the table of contents that it has chapters aligned with the content that was on this entry. Again, I hope that getting other people involved will prevent this from being an edit war reflecting our personal differences about this entry. Dtunkelang (talk) 22:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]