Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pawn (scripting language)
Help need find a more permanent place to leave my comments
[edit]Dear Wikipedia administrators @Cryptic,
I would like to leave a message of support. May I ask if it's appropriate to leave a message on the talk page of the article in question? I'm a bit hesitant because previous discussions I've started have been deleted without prior notice. I'm hoping to find a more permanent place to leave my comments.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
- Strong Keep a life, This language is used in the real world. I made a draft, please enable the Articles Putu Suhartawan (talk) 00:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Reasons to Use a Bot to Notify New Users
To enhance user experience, increase participation, and maintain content quality on Wikipedia, a bot can be utilized to:
Provide immediate assistance: Bots can quickly detect new users and offer relevant information or guidance.
Offer relevant information: Bots can provide essential information about Wikipedia, including usage guidelines, rules, and policies.
Prevent errors and confusion: Bots can guide new users to avoid common mistakes and clarify any confusing concepts.
Promote quality content: Bots can highlight worthy articles for featured status or prevent unnecessary deletions.
Encourage user participation: Bots can motivate new users to contribute actively and have a positive initial experience. Reasons to Maintain the Pawn (scripting language) Article
Historical significance: Pawn has a notable history in game development.
Active community: Despite being less popular than modern languages, Pawn still has a dedicated community.
Educational value: Pawn can be a valuable learning tool for beginners.
Relevance in game development: Pawn remains relevant in certain game development projects.
Potential for future development: Pawn may find new applications or evolve in the future.
By using a bot to assist new users and maintaining the Pawn (scripting language) article, Wikipedia can enhance user experience, promote quality content, and preserve valuable knowledge. Putu Suhartawan (talk) 01:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- The only discussion you started was at the WP:Help desk, and it's still there. And no, bots can't do any of that; and none of what you listed is at all relevant to our inclusion criteria. The short, short version is what Spartaz wrote closing this discussion: "sources win AFDs - or lack thereof." —Cryptic 01:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)