Talk:Core-matrix theory of thalamus
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Is this only a neuroscience topic?
Given that core-matrix classifications exist I geology, I had thought the thalamus & basal ganglia core-matrix models were borrowed from that field. Does anyone know otherwise? LetThereBeNick (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @LetThereBeNick I am not an expert on neuroscience. And I don't know anything about core-matrix classifications in geology. But I've been reading a 2024 review paper about the matrix-core subdivision of thalamic neurons recently.
- In neuroscience, people talk about "matrix" as being for example all of the stuff which exists between cells, namely the extracellular matrix. Then inside this "matrix" or "network" of stuff, which is a hydrogel, there are neurons, axons and dendrites. So in that context, the matrix is everything except neurons, whereas in the thalamus context, the matrix is a subset of the neurons. Clearly this is contradictory usage.
- In the thalamus context, the matrix neurons are a kind of general neurons which don't do so much information-wise. But the "core" neurons carry real sensory information to the cerebral cortex. They are more focused in location. So they bring more specific, detailed sensory data.
- Does this all sound similar to the geology vocabulary? Where are the geology terms defined?
- Alan U. Kennington (talk) 01:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @LetThereBeNick The title of this article is very poorly chosen. It should be called "Core-matrix theory of thalamus neurons", or something like that. Alan U. Kennington (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)