Talk:People...Hold On

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 29 August 2024

It has been proposed in this section that People...Hold On be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the name being decided below.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log

People ... Hold On → ? – Looking through sources, a lot of them have the title be either People... Hold On or People...Hold On, and I'm not sure which would be the more correct title. reppop^talk 01:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I think I'm seeing more People...Hold On without the space, in my source search. Bobby Cohn (talk) 00:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: First relist. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. MOS:ELLIPSIS would seem to favor the current title, but it's fairly unimportant which is used as long as the other two redirect there. Station1 (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I agree with that reading of MOS:ELLIPSIS, actually; I think the album's title is using the "pause or suspension of speech" usage of the triple dots, in which case MOS:ELLIPSIS recommends retaining the punctuation in its original form. (However, I do agree that, as long as all three permutations ultimately point to the same article, it's not a huge deal which one is the main title.) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]