Template:Arbitration case implementation notes/Proposal/Automatic/sandbox

This is the template sandbox page for Template:Arbitration case implementation notes/Proposal/Automatic (diff).

Template documentation

This template uses Lua:

Module:Arbitration Committee implementation notes/Proposal/Automatic (sandbox)

This is an experimental version of Template:Arbitration Committee implementation notes/Proposal that automatically detects new votes as they are added. It uses the same parameters for the most part. However, support=, oppose=, and abstain= can be left blank for automatic detection.

Example appearance

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision—at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion to close the case until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

These notes were last updated by automatic template check; the last edit to this page was on 03:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC) by HouseBlaster.

Proposed principles
Number	Proposal Name	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status	Support needed	Notes
1.3	Example appearance	0	0	0		Cannot pass
1.4	Example	?	?	?		?	Error: Found 0 sections with heading `===Example===`
0	0		Cannot pass
Proposed findings of fact
Number	Proposal Name	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status	Support needed	Notes
None proposed
Proposed remedies
Number	Proposal Name	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status	Support needed	Notes
None proposed
Proposed enforcement
Number	Proposal Name	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status	Support needed	Notes
None proposed

Notes

The above documentation is transcluded from Template:Arbitration case implementation notes/Proposal/Automatic/doc.
Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox and testcases pages.
Subpages of this template.