Babble hypothesis
In psycholinguistics and leadership studies, the babble hypothesis (demonstratively labeled the babble effect) is a conjecture that posits a strong correlation between the amount of speaking time an individual has in group settings and their likelihood of emerging as a leader, as commonly opposed to quality of speech.[1][2] According to the hypothesis, individuals who contribute more verbal input during group interactions are more likely to be perceived and recognized as leaders.
History of study
Examples of the hypothesis
See also
- Agitprop
- Active measures
- Big lie
- Cult
- Cult of personality
- Firehose of falsehood
- Illusory truth effect
- Information warfare
- Propaganda techniques
- Leadership
References
- ^ Mast, Marianne Schmid; Hall, Judith A. (2004-09-01). "Who Is the Boss and Who Is Not? Accuracy of Judging Status". Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 28 (3): 145–165. doi:10.1023/B:JONB.0000039647.94190.21. ISSN 1573-3653.
- ^ MacLaren, Neil G.; Yammarino, Francis J.; Dionne, Shelley D.; Sayama, Hiroki; Mumford, Michael D.; Connelly, Shane; Martin, Robert W.; Mulhearn, Tyler J.; Todd, E. Michelle; Kulkarni, Ankita; Cao, Yiding; Ruark, Gregory A. (2020-10-01). "Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups". The Leadership Quarterly. 31 (5): 101409. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101409. ISSN 1048-9843.