Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Environment Integrity
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Web Environment Integrity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SUSTAINED and the 10-year test. The last significant coverage of this incident was in 2023 and the proposal was abandoned and failed to get significant traction. We are not a newspaper. Sohom (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Sohom (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - notability is not temporary. Kinopiko talk 23:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Kinopiko Could you explain how the subject has received significant coverage over a "sufficiently significant period" (as required by WP:GNG)?
- To expand of my rationale, according to the sourcing in the article (and what I could find online) there are exactly three reliable sources that have covered this issue from a period starting at July 26 2023 when the proposal was announced till November 2023 when the proposal was withdrawn. I personally would not consider that level of coverage to be significant enough coverage over an extended period of time for the subject matter. There has been no RS coverage of the issue since, something that is expected of similar topics in web privacy (see for example Client Hints, or the Privacy Sandbox both of which had similar negative pushback but has had more sustained coverage due to the fact that they were implemented in Chrome). Sohom (talk) 04:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)