Wikipedia talk:Extended image syntax

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Extended image syntax page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 3 months

Wikipedia Help NA‑class Low‑importance

	This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp
NA	This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Low	This page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

em sizes

I think em sizes should be perfectly possible to support by now. Just have a bit JavaScript fix up the src-attributes if it turns out the initial guess was incorrect. 92.67.227.181 (talk) 16:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to change the default format of galleries

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § Galleries. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 03:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undocumented: muted and loop options for videos; others?

A loop video

A muted video

A couple of years ago, the loop and muted keywords were added to codebase. Examples to the right.

These are not documented. Which makes me wonder, if there are other important undocumented options...

Should I go ahead and add these to the page? --Nanite (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are documented: mediawikiwiki:Extension:TimedMediaHandler#Syntax_synopsis —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quote marks around code examples

Is there any reason why long sections of this have quote marks around the code examples? This seems strange and potentially confusing formatting, with the risk that people will think they have to type the quote marks, besides being redundant and distracting.

Surely part of the point of using code style is that the text can be shown exactly as entered, without needing punctuation?

Edit: OK, I see that one user unilaterally put them in. Unfortunately, it looks as though there are also now places where bold italic code was taken out of code style altogether, so the typography doesn't match the opening explanation of how it's used. Musiconeologist (talk) 23:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I think I've now repaired the Brief syntax section, at least. I wanted to read up about the syntax and was finding the quote marks and changed formatting impossibly distracting.

I didn't simply revert the edits that added them, as it looked a bit too risky a process that might lose good edits as well. Musiconeologist (talk) 19:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Displaying groups of images

Why does this page not mention templates like {{Photo montage}} and {{multiple image}}? Jarble (talk) 15:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]