If you're a registered user and believe an article meets the good article criteria, you may nominate it below. Before nominating your first article, you may want to read the guide for nominating good articles for extra hints and tips.
The nomination process:
Find the most appropriate section from those listed below. If you're not sure which one section is best, use "Miscellaneous".
List the article at the bottom of that section:
Copy this for the syntax: # {{la|ArticleName}} ~~~~
Copy this for the edit summary: "Nominating [[ArticleName]]"
Add {{GAnominee|~~~~~}} (five tildes) to the nominated article's talk page.
Note that it may take more than a few weeks for your article to be reviewed, as this page tends to have a large backlog. You can help by reviewing other articles while waiting for yours to be reviewed.
only registered users may review articles—make sure you are logged in;
you cannot review an article if you have made significant contributions to it prior to the review, nor can you review an article if you are the nominator;
you should not pass an article that was put on hold by another editor without assessing the problem;
nominations towards the top of each section are older, and should be given higher priority.
Paste #:{{GAReview}} ~~~~ below the entry; this avoids multiple reviews of the same article.
Check the "quick-fail criteria" before reading the article in detail: if a quick fail is appropriate, add your reason to the talk page and go to the fail process; otherwise continue with the next step.
Read the whole article, and decide whether it should pass or fail based on the criteria listed here. You can also put the article "On Hold" or ask for a second opinion. If you wish, you can inform the nominator of your action (e.g., using {{subst:GANotice}}).
Reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to fix problems with the article under review.
Remove the article from the nominations list using the edit summary "Passed [[''ArticleName'']]".
Remove {{GAnominee}} from the article's talk page and either add {{GA|~~~~~}}[1] or update the {{ArticleHistory}} template.[2] Please include "GA" in your edit summary.
Leave a review of the article, giving an overview of how you believe the article fulfills the Good article criteria (with suggestions to improve the article, if you can). {{subst:PGAN}} may help you organise the critique. You can also use {{subst:GAList}} or {{subst:GAList2}} to generate a checklist.
List the article on Wikipedia:Good articles under the appropriate section. Consider listing it at the top of the good articles page under "Recently listed good articles".
If the problems are easy to resolve, it might be better to be bold and fix it yourself.
Otherwise, remove the article from the nominations list using the edit summary "Failed [[Article Name]]".
Remove {{GAnominee}} from the article's talk page and either add {{FailedGA|~~~~~}}[1] or update the {{ArticleHistory}} template.[2] Please include "GA" in your edit summary.
State which criteria were not met on the article's talk page. The template {{subst:FGAN}} may help you organize the critique. You can also use {{subst:GAList}} or {{subst:GAList2}} to generate a checklist. Please detail the article's flaws to help other editors improve the article for another GA nomination.
If your sole criterion for rejecting the article was a lack of appropriate references, please add the article to the Unreferenced GA Nominations list.
You may put an article "On Hold" for a period of time. To put an article on hold:
Copy and paste the following below the nomination entry: #: {{GAOnHold|ArticleName}} ~~~~.
On the talk page of the article, replace {{GAnominee}} with {{GAonhold|~~~~~}}.
Don't forget to specify on the talk page what needs to be done. You may use {{subst:GAList}} to generate a list, or {{subst:GANOH}} for greater explanation and/or plain text.
If you are uncertain whether an article fully meets the Good article criteria, you may ask for a more experienced reviewer or subject expert to offer a second opinion on the article. To make such a request:
Copy and paste the following below the nomination entry: #: {{GA2ndopinion|ArticleName}} ~~~~.
On the talk page of the article, replace {{GAnominee}} with {{GA2ndoptalk|~~~~~}}.
Don't forget to review the article yourself, stating what needs to be done on the article's talk page, using {{subst:GAList}} to generate a list, {{subst:GANOH}} for greater explanation and/or plain text - according to your choosing.
^ ab The five tildes supply the date of the review. It is also helpful to add an "oldid" and "topic" to the template, using the syntax {{GA|~~~~~|oldid=nnnnnn|topic=topic name}}. Replace nnnnnn by the id number of the reviewed version, which may be found by clicking the "Permanent link" in the toolbox on the left side navigation bar of the page: the id number is to be found in the url after the word 'oldid'. The topic name should be one of the topic abbreviations.
^ abThe {{ArticleHistory}} template allows other editors to follow the article's milestones such as peer review and FAC in addition to GAN: the syntax needs to be followed carefully for the template to display correctly. When you have finished building ArticleHistory, please scroll to the bottom of the talk page to make sure the red ArticleHistory error category is not highlighted.
