Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principle of abstraction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Benison (talk | contribs) at 01:56, 4 April 2024 (Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Principle of abstraction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient content to determine article subject. Existing content is unclear. No sources given.

WP:BEFORE search is complicated. Most uses of the phrase are in reference to philosophy of Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell. Admittedly, I am having a hard time understanding their meaning of this term. See, eg.

  • Fine, Kit (2002). The Limits of Abstraction. Oxford University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-19-924618-2.
  • Angelelli, Ignacio (2004). "Adventures of abstraction". In Coniglione, Francesco; Poli, Roberto; Rollinger, Robin D. (eds.). Idealization XI: Historical Studies on Abstraction and Idealization. BRILL. pp. 9–35. doi:10.1163/9789004333215_003. ISBN 978-90-04-33321-5.
  • Beaney, Michael (2010-12-22). "Analysis and abstraction principles in Russell and Frege". The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203939703. ISBN 978-1-134-17805-6.

Mauri Leppänen seems to have independently developed her own meaning for the phrase.

While this is dense material that I have not fully grasped, I am sufficiently persuaded that their meaning is not closely related to the current content of this article, and so is irrelevant to this discussion. Daask (talk) 17:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 01:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]