Talk:Invisible String
![]() | Invisible String has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 14, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Invisible String/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I will complete this review within one week.
One issue I immediately see is ref. 42 (ARIA Charts – Accreditations – 2024 Singles) is missing a URL in the citation. -Riley1012 (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Riley1012! I will take over this GAN as per the nominator's request in my talk page. Gained (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for taking it over!
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
- ...and the United Kingdom, where it received a silver certfication. certification is misspelled.
- In a premise for Folklore that Swift posted onto her social media... switch "onto" to "on"
- ..."Invisible String" employs an autobiographical songwriting... remove the word "an"
2. Verifiable
Earwig's Copyvio check shows similarities between the article and other websites because of the song quotes used, but the actual prose of the article does not appear to be copied from another source. The references are reliable, and there are no unsourced claims.
- Spot check:
- No issues: 1, 3, 8, 11, 14, 16, 18, 23, 29, 31, 32, 35, 38, 41
3. Broad
The article is broad and focused in its coverage.
4. Neutral
The article is neutral in its coverage of the song.
5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day.
6. Illustrated
The image in this article is free to use and has a relevant caption. The audio file is fair use and has a relevant caption.
The CS1 error mentioned above has already been addressed. All that is left to be corrected are a few minor prose issues, which I can do myself. I will go ahead and pass this article, well done @Ippantekina and @Gained! -Riley1012 (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)