Talk:Multiresolution analysis

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

WHAT IS MEANT BY MULTIRESOLUTION WAVELET ANALYSIS

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.230.2 (talk • contribs) 21 July 2010, 19:56

Please don't shout, sign your talk contributions and use some punctuation. As the word says, something is analysed using wavelets, and as is the nature of wavelets, they come in different scales, so the analysis is performed on different scales or resolutions. That the process gave its name to the tool used is something that history has to answer for.--LutzL (talk) 11:50, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Definition : unclear line about the space resolution

I would have a couple of questions about this assertion : "for $k>l$ the space resolution $2^{l}$ of the $l$ -th subspace is higher than the resolution $2^{k}$ of the $k$ -th subspace"

As $x\mapsto 2^{x}$ is an increasing function, if $k>l$ , how can be $2^{k}<2^{l}$ ? Is it just a typo, or did I miss some crucial element?
In a more general way, how is defined the space resolution? Is the space resolution of $V_{k}$ always equal to $2^{k}$ ?

Thank you for any enlightenment,

Cacophonie (talk) 14:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]