Talk:RLV Technology Demonstration Programme

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indian Space Shuttle Programme was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 5 July 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into RLV Technology Demonstration Programme. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Requested move 27 February 2024

It has been proposed in this section that RLV Technology Demonstration Programme be renamed and moved to Pushpak (spaceplane).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

RLV Technology Demonstration Programme → Pushpak (spaceplane) – namechange as per this slide in today's livestream —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 07:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree: We need larger context of it. Is it just particular mission is it about whole programme etc. We should wait for the name change to show up in official documents and website like it was done for LVM3. At one point they even referred to RLV-TD as Pegasus in one of their videos but clearly that was one off mention. Ohsin 18:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah bro, its can even be a rlv pushpak like space Shuttle Atlantis. But no problem, lets see where this discussion goes. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 18:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Few RLV-LEX tests should be attempted in coming weeks/months and may be it will clear up then or in Annual Report due in Early March 2024. Ohsin 18:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Supported, Times of India already made an article about the renaming of the RLV program to Pushpak. user:FossilDS 17:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:NAMECHANGE. Pushpak (spaceplane) can be created as a redirect here, but it is far too early to move this page and I can find next to no sources using this new name compared to the old one. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 00:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/science/story/india-reusable-landing-vehicle-to-be-called-pushpak-pm-reviews-progress-2507692-2024-02-27 take this mate @Eejit43 —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 03:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright? I don't disagree that this is a new name for the subject, I'm opposing as it hasn't been shown to be the WP:COMMONNAME yet per WP:NAMECHANGE. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am bit confused later that is media misinterpreted by the fact that, is it RLV Pusphak synonymous to Space Shuttle (SS) Discovery. Like we say SS Discovery, isn't it its RLV Pushpak unlike just Pushpak? (Sorry if you didn't understand I will say again) —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 03:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I kinda of understand what you are saying, but I don't see how it directly relates to this request.

Again, as "Pushpak" is the new name of the "RLV Technology Demonstration Programme", then WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NAMECHANGE apply and I oppose this move.

I don't see how "RLV Pusphak" comes into this, that title isn't directly involved in this request, and the current title and requested target are entirely different, it has nothing to do with abbreviations, etc. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No i mean @Eejit43 isnt only that ship, pushpak? if yes then i am withdrawing my move request —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 04:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain ; we ought to wait till more sources confirm ( maybe we can create after the RLV - ORX or that orbital re-entry experiment . ISRO is bound to clear up the name by then. RAZOR-X (talk) 02:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noice —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 03:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]