Talk:Architecture tradeoff analysis method

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Systems: Enterprise modelling Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Enterprise modelling.

Notability

Is this method used in any place outside of the book? Is there a third party using it, outside the author of the book and the Software Engineering Institute at the Carnegie Mellon University ? From my googling it seems that no. Jgc2003 (talk) 07:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ATAM Used by Many Organizations

From my research there are many people using the ATAM process or variations of it. I am currently using this process for the US Library of Congress NDIIPP project. --Dan 20:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

I am attending a Enterprise Data conference (Enterprise Data World) and ATAM is a recognized method for looking at architecture tradeoffs. See the presentation by Malcolm Chisholm --Dan 20:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

ATAM is suggested along with CBAM and others in diverse Software Architecture Trainings, e.g. the training to achieve the Certified Professional for Software Architecture, Foundation Level (CPSA-F, see for example https://www.oose.de/seminar/softwarearchitektur-mit-methode-inkl-isaqb-cpsa-f/ (in German)) and in the IMPROVE Workshop (see http://www.arc42.de/improve.html). The Links have been visited on Apr. 19, 2018.

Quality of the References and External Links

Some references and both external links are dead meanwhile. Are there any additional resources where the method is described in more detail?

Broken links fixed --Rcdeboer (talk) 15:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]