Jump to content

Talk:Univalent function

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.198.37.16 (talk) at 19:34, 4 February 2024 ({{maths rating |class=start|priority=low}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Redundant but traditional

This article supports a long tradition of research in complex analysis of schlicht functions. In 1985 a long-standing conjecture was solved by de Branges's theorem. Currently MathSciNet turns up 279 articles on schlicht functions and 67 on univalent functions.

Nevertheless, a function (mathematics) is a special type of binary relation said to be univalent. Thus all functions are univalent and the term "univalent function" is redundant. This terminology in binary relations has been adopted by Gunther Schmidt in his books on relations, which have been well-received and widely used. In some situations the univalent property ( (xRy and xRz) implies y = z) holds, but the domain of the relation falls short of what is expected, leaving a partial function.

In summary, the analytic and injective functions that are said to be "univalent" represent a special and peculiar use of the term in complex analysis. Young students having studied binary relations, and the description of functions as univalent relations, may later be surprised by this special and peculiar use of the term. — Rgdboer (talk) 23:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]